CIS in CIS Worldwide stands for Complete Investigation Services and that is exactly what you will get. CisWorldwide will enable you to search through over 300.000.000 records that include anything from arrest, conviction, incarceration, sex offender, and DUI records. These were collected from all around the country and include more than 500 databases (from cities, counties and states).
Using CIS Worldwide really couldn’t be easier. All you do is enter a person’s first and last name and you’re done. If you are trying to look up a more common name, you can narrow down the results by using that person’s date of birth. CisWorldwide is an inexpensive way to quickly check someone’s history. You can perform a state search for $5.95 and nationwide search for $7.95.
Price: $5.95
All orders are protected by SSL encryption - the highest industry standard for online security from trusted vendors like VeriSign and Thawte.
Total waste of money -- outdated and nothing found
By Mel (Pittsburgh, USA) - See all my reviews
Posted on: April 29, 2009
I tried to get employment history -- couldn't find ANYTHING, didn't even come up. Then I did a basic background check of myself, which yielded my childhood home only, no DOB, no address history... absolutely worthless information. $25 down the drain.
Did you find this review helpful?
![]()
1 out of 1 people answered “Yes”
Rip Off
By Rick (Fort Mohave, USA) - See all my reviews
Posted on: May 18, 2008
While the web site is very impressive, the $30.00 to $50.00 initial fee for unlimited access is nothing more than a come on and is depleted every time you do a records search (like marriage/divorce records) and the results leave a lot to be desired (got a marriage date, but no divorce date) how can you do that when they both took place in the same town??? After about 6 searches, you have depleted your initial charge amount, and since they have your credit card info, they are happy to keep pulling funds from your account. KEEP AWAY FROM THIS RIP OFF OUTFIT!!!!
Did you find this review helpful?
![]()
1 out of 2 people answered “Yes”